technologist, product engineer and human dev aggregator
That feedback means more than any vote could. Thank you dalmaer!
Sorry, I'm confused. That's what we're doing with PolySocket: strictly implementing the WebSocket interface.
Other solutions that solve this problem all force their own API.
Thanks for the feedback! :)
What polyfills do you currently use? This is meant to be a platform agnostic polyfill so that you don't have to mess around with runtime specific shims like Socket.IO, SockJS, and others. You can pick your favorite language for the server, build it expecting vanilla web sockets, and let PolySocket worry about unsupported clients.
Sorry, took me a while to realize what you said.
var ps = new PolySocket(uri) // why not WebSocket
I like that. Definitely need to give PolySocket some love in the way it clobbers/takes-over globals.
Oh I see!
Yeah, I prefer more explicit approach, magic is good, but only to some extent. :) Thanx.
Thanks for the vote and the awesome feedback, stay tuned!